Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

 PMID:36631540  

Balancing the safeguarding of privacy and data sharing: perceptions of genomic professionals on patient genomic data ownership in Australia.

Yuwan Malakar | Justine Lacey | Natalie A Twine | Rod McCrea | Denis C Bauer
European journal of human genetics : EJHG | 2024

There are inherent complexities and tensions in achieving a responsible balance between safeguarding patients' privacy and sharing genomic data for advancing health and medical science. A growing body of literature suggests establishing patient genomic data ownership, enabled by blockchain technology, as one approach for managing these priorities. We conducted an online survey, applying a mixed methods approach to collect quantitative (using scale questions) and qualitative data (using open-ended questions). We explored the views of 117 genomic professionals (clinical geneticists, genetic counsellors, bioinformaticians, and researchers) towards patient data ownership in Australia. Data analysis revealed most professionals agreed that patients have rights to data ownership. However, there is a need for a clearer understanding of the nature and implications of data ownership in this context as genomic data often is subject to collective ownership (e.g., with family members and laboratories). This research finds that while the majority of genomic professionals acknowledge the desire for patient data ownership, bioinformaticians and researchers expressed more favourable views than clinical geneticists and genetic counsellors, suggesting that their views on this issue may be shaped by how closely they interact with patients as part of their professional duties. This research also confirms that stronger health system infrastructure is a prerequisite for enabling patient data ownership, which needs to be underpinned by appropriate digital infrastructure (e.g., central vs. decentralised data storage), patient identity ownership (e.g., limited vs. self-sovereign identity), and policy at both federal and state levels.

Pubmed ID: 36631540

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Additional research tools detected in this publication

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

None

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


CSIRO (tool)

RRID:SCR_011167

CSIRO, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, is Australia''s national science agency and one of the largest and most diverse research agencies in the world. National Research Flagships: Large-scale, long-term, multidisciplinary science to address Australia''s major national challenges and opportunities. Divisions: CSIRO expertise is organised into 14 research areas: * Animal, Food and Health Sciences * Astronomy and Space Science * Earth Science and Resource Engineering * Ecosystem Sciences * Energy Technology * Food & Nutritional Sciences * ICT Centre * Land and Water * Livestock Industries * Marine and Atmospheric Research * Materials Science & Engineering * Mathematics, Informatics and Statistics * Plant Industry * Process Science and Engineering National Facilities: CSIRO manages national facilities and collections that are opened to researchers around Australia and overseas.

View all literature mentions