Searching the Resource Information Network

Our searching services are busy right now. Please try again later

  • Register
X
Forgot Password

If you have forgotten your password you can enter your email here and get a temporary password sent to your email.

X

Leaving Community

Are you sure you want to leave this community? Leaving the community will revoke any permissions you have been granted in this community.

No
Yes

 PMID:30090875  

Multi-region proteome analysis quantifies spatial heterogeneity of prostate tissue biomarkers.

Tiannan Guo | Li Li | Qing Zhong | Niels J Rupp | Konstantina Charmpi | Christine E Wong | Ulrich Wagner | Jan H Rueschoff | Wolfram Jochum | Christian Daniel Fankhauser | Karim Saba | Cedric Poyet | Peter J Wild | Ruedi Aebersold | Andreas Beyer
Life science alliance | 2018

It remains unclear to what extent tumor heterogeneity impacts on protein biomarker discovery. Here, we quantified proteome intra-tissue heterogeneity (ITH) based on a multi-region analysis of prostate tissues using pressure cycling technology and SWATH mass spectrometry. We quantified 6,873 proteins and analyzed the ITH of 3,700 proteins. The level of ITH varied depending on proteins and tissue types. Benign tissues exhibited more complex ITH patterns than malignant tissues. Spatial variability of ten prostate biomarkers was validated by immunohistochemistry in an independent cohort (n=83) using tissue microarrays. PSA was preferentially variable in benign prostatic hyperplasia, while GDF15 substantially varied in prostate adenocarcinomas. Further, we found that DNA repair pathways exhibited a high degree of variability in tumorous tissues, which may contribute to the genetic heterogeneity of tumors. This study conceptually adds a new perspective to protein biomarker discovery: it suggests that recent technological progress should be exploited to quantify and account for spatial proteome variation to complement biomarker identification and utilization.

Pubmed ID: 30090875

Research resources used in this publication

None found

Antibodies used in this publication

None found

Associated grants

  • Agency: European Research Council, International
    Id: 233226
  • Agency: European Research Council, International
    Id: 670821

Publication data is provided by the National Library of Medicine ® and PubMed ®. Data is retrieved from PubMed ® on a weekly schedule. For terms and conditions see the National Library of Medicine Terms and Conditions.

This is a list of tools and resources that we have found mentioned in this publication.


ConsensusPathDB (tool)

RRID:SCR_002231

An integrative interaction database that integrates different types of functional interactions from heterogeneous interaction data resources. Physical protein interactions, metabolic and signaling reactions and gene regulatory interactions are integrated in a seamless functional association network that simultaneously describes multiple functional aspects of genes, proteins, complexes, metabolites, etc. With human, yeast and mouse complex functional interactions, it currently constitutes the most comprehensive publicly available interaction repository for these species. Different ways of utilizing these integrated interaction data, in particular with tools for visualization, analysis and interpretation of high-throughput expression data in the light of functional interactions and biological pathways is offered.

View all literature mentions

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (tool)

RRID:SCR_003199

Software package for interpreting gene expression data. Used for interpretation of a large-scale experiment by identifying pathways and processes.

View all literature mentions

ProteoWizard (tool)

RRID:SCR_012056

Software that enables rapid tool creation by providing a robust, pluggable development framework that simplifies and unifies data file access, and performs standard proteomics and LCMS dataset computations.

View all literature mentions

topGO (tool)

RRID:SCR_014798

Software package which provides tools for testing GO terms while accounting for the topology of the GO graph. Different test statistics and different methods for eliminating local similarities and dependencies between GO terms can be implemented and applied.

View all literature mentions